| Grizzly Bear During Hibernation [16] |
In the IPCC Summary 2007, they go over the different causes of an increase in global warming, the main reason being an increase in greenhouse gases. In a study where they went out to explain how these changes in greenhouse gases are causing a change in precipitation rate and evaporation rates which further influence primary producers due to water stress [10]. The study goes on to explain one of two possible outcomes due to the increase in CO2, it could increase plant production due to this direct increase, or decrease due to the increase of constraints put upon these producers.
The potential trophic level asynchrony is a definite possibility in the case of Grizzly Bears and their sources of nutrients [14]. This could result in an earlier occurrence in hibernation ending, where the bears come out and begin to feed on the many types of food. Models showing how reproductive output is highly influenced by both the bear population and the Whitebark Pine, a vegetational primary food source of the Grizzly Bears that is one of the main parts of their diet. The possibility of this primary food source and the grizzly bears hibernation changing, there could be a large impact on the reproductive rate of the population in Greater Yellowstone [10]. By the year 2050, the peak runoff for Greater Yellowstone's rivers occurring 10-20 days earlier than before, showing there is more than just vegetation being influenced. In order to explain how this runoff would be directly affected due to these climatic changes, the previous trend of increased temperature and the potential 3.5 degrees warming in the area would increase the time of melting in the spring and result in this 10-20 day change [2]. This goes to show how little it takes to cause a fairly significant change. This website also states that the Whitebark Pine I have previously mentioned has had about 85% of its population die off.
I like this section. Very related to what we talked about in class regarding "phenological shift". I would try to inculcate phrases like that where you can. It will make the blog sound a lot more scientific, if you will :)
ReplyDeleteAll in all, this is a good start but you are missing a key component of this project: AN ORIGINAL FIGURE OF YOUR OWN! Other than that, besides some grammatical and spelling errors, this is a good start.
ReplyDeleteSome grammatical errors and perhaps more integration with your sources rather than citing the title of a paper and a sentence summarizing. An example would be providing a short explanation on trophic level asynchrony would be more helpful to the reader than referring them to Thackeray et al, these changes will also help in enacting Marong's suggestions.
ReplyDelete